Legal Opinion

Kinsell & Locke, Inc. v. Kohlman

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1930No. 13,117PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

This is a suit for $284.93, damages for the alleged breach of a written contract entered into between plaintiff and defendant on October 16, 1926. Defendant denied liability, and, from a judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the suit, plaintiff has appealed.

Under the provisions of the contract plaintiff agreed to manufacture, and defendant agreed to buy, 1,000 dozen socks at the price of $1.75 per dozen, or a total of $1,750. The goods were sold f. o. b. Philadelphia, and on the face of the contract appears the following: “Shipping date February 15, 1927.” Shipment of the goods was made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Murray v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  3. Jennings-Heywood Oil Syndicate v. Houssiere-Latreille Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  4. Lundy v. S. Pfeifer & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  5. Shelby Mills, Inc. v. NamiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shaw Constructors, Cross-Appellee v. Icf Kaiser Engineers, Inc., Pcs Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. General Electric Capital Corp. v. Southeastern Health Care, Inc., and Prentiss E. Smith, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. Haskins Trading Co. v. S. Pfeifer & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Shaw Constructors v. ICF Kaiser EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API