Minnesota Sandstone Co. v. Clark
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Richardson, J., entered March 21, 1902, in favor of the plaintiff, by direction of the court upon withdrawing the case from the jury at the close of the evidence, in an action for a balance due for stone sold and delivered.
1Per curiam
The Minnesota Sandstone Company, plaintiff, commenced this action against E'. Lewis Clark, defendant, in the superior court of Spokane county, to recover a balance due said company on a written contract. Judgment was rendered herein in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
Respondent company’s cause of action is founded upon a written contract, executed to it by appellant, which is as follows:
“September 13, 1900.
“Mr. W. W. Butler, Agent Minnesota Sandstone Co., Spokane, Washington. Dear sir: We accept your proposal for the sum of five thousand and two hundred and fifty dollars for the cut…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coppell v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Eighmie v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Doon v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Sampson v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Gelpcke v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Durant v. SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
- Bond v. WiegardtWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Sherwood v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Olsen v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Wendlandt v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.