Atkins North America, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
In this case, an engineering design firm challenges the government’s claim for damages resulting from a purportedly faulty design. The sole issue presented by the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment is whether the contracting officer’s decision on the government’s claim is valid. Because the contracting officer exercised independent judgment by becoming familiar with the facts and conclusions contained in the decision and adopting them as her own, the court con-*493eludes that it is. Accordingly, the court grants defendant’s motion.
I. BACKGROUND
On October…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Uniglobe General Trading & Contracting Company, Wll v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Johnson Lasky Kindelin Architects, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020