Legal Opinion

Gray v. Bennett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 23, 1959No. 102PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

In our opinion, if it should be conceded that the employer-employee relationship existed between the plaintiff and the defendiant at the time complained of, the evidence adduced in the trial below is; súfficient, if believed by the jury, to support a finding of want of ■ .probable cause.

Even so, the-contract under which the plaintiff worked and the course of the business as actually conducted pursuant thereto, created the relation of debtor and creditor only. S. v. Covert, 14 Wash. 652, 45 P. 304; Dixie Fire Ins. Co. v. Nelson, 128 Tenn. 70, 157 S.W. 416; S. v. Carr, 169 Wash. 56, 13 P 2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dixie Fire Insurance v. NelsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State v. CovertWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State v. CarrWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Chicago Fire & Marine Insurance v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. PearceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  2. State v. McCaskillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Flippo v. HayesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Johnson v. WhittingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Flippo v. HayesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API