State v. McCaskill
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.
Defendant contends the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to strike the use of the word employment by the State’s witnesses. In his arguments I through V defendant contends the references invaded the province of the jury in that whether the defendant was an employee of the State’s witnesses was the ultimate question to be decided by the jury. Defendant contends that he was an independent contractor and complains of references to the defendant being an “employee” of Bill Meadors and Perry Walton.
Mr. Meadors testified that he is co-owner of Action…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. Blackley.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- State v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
- State v. BlockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HardinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. KeyesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. NewellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.