Legal Opinion

Chicago Fire & Marine Insurance v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1933No. Civil No. 3243PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an action by Chicago Fire and Marine Insurance Company, a corporation, hereinafter called plaintiff, against Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, a corporation, hereinafter called defendant, to recover on a certain indemnity bond issued by defendant in favor of plaintiff and claimed by the latter to guarantee it against loss occasioned plaintiff by reason of the larceny or embezzlement of one Charles E. MacMillin.

The case was heard-before the court without a jury, and at the close of plaintiff’s evidence defendant moved for judgment, which motion was granted, and judgment was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. McFetridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. People's BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  4. Monongahela Coal Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1899
  5. National Surety Co. v. McCutcheonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Laird v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1941
  2. Gray v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. United States of America v Dwayne LequireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API