Legal Opinion

Cain v. Powers

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1983No. 14754PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEDERICI, Justice.

Plaintiffs-appellees (plaintiffs) John Cain, Norma Cain, Gene Holmes and Geraldine Holmes, brought suit to enforce a restrictive covenant in a real estate instrument which prohibited the placing of a trailer house on a parcel of realty they had sold to the defendants-appellants (defendants) Joseph Powers and Genovieve Powers. Defendants placed a mobile home on the realty in question but maintain that the mobile home was not specifically prohibited by the restrictive covenant. At the trial on November 9, 1982, plaintiffs’ counsel and one of the plaintiffs were present,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lassiter v. BlissTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hannula v. Hacienda Homes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Riley v. StovesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  4. Timmerman v. GabrielMontana Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Neece v. KantuNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hill v. Community of Damien of MolokaiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Wilcox v. Timberon Protective AssociationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Sharts v. WaltersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Wayne v. Bennie J. Aday & Dixie J. Aday Revocable TrustNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Baker v. THE ADAY TRUSTNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API