Legal Opinion
Radloff v. National Food Stores, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1963PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
There are three separate issues to be resolved on this appeal. They are:
1. What duty does a storekeeper owe to a customer to protect that customer from injuries caused to him by the intentional acts of an escaping shoplifter ?
2. Did the trial court err in not granting a nonsuit?
3. Did the trial court err in not granting a directed verdict ?
First: What duty does a storekeeper owe to a customer to protect that customer from injuries caused to him by the intentional acts of an escaping shoplifterf Before considering the nature of a storekeeper’s duty to protect customers *228from injuries caused by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Rusch v. Sentinel-News Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Smith v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Schumacher v. KlabundeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- McClung v. Delta Square Ltd. PartnershipTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Crain v. Cleveland Lodge 1532, Order of Moose, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Cook v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Giant Food, Inc. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.