Legal Opinion

Corporation Commission v. Bank of Vanceboro

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCohNOR, J.

The procedure in the instant case was in substantial compliance with statutes in force at the date of the commencement of the action, providing for the enforcement of the statutory liability of stockholders of banking corporations. In Smathers v. Bank, 135 N. C., 410, 47 S. E., 893, it is said:

“In winding up the affairs of an insolvent corporation it is best that, as nearly as may be, the court having original jurisdiction bring all the parties interested in the final decree before it, to the end that their rights and equities may be adjusted and administered. The usual and better practice is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smathers v. Bank.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Corp. Commission v. Merchants BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Wooten v. . CunninghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Corporation Commission v. . MurpheySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Greenville Banking & Trust Co. v. LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Independence Trust Co. v. KeeslerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API