State ex rel. Hudson v. Webber
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MANFORD, Judge.
This is an original proceeding in prohibition. A preliminary writ issued. Briefing and argument were to the court en banc. The preliminary writ is made absolute.
Summary judgment had been entered against relator. General execution secured partial satisfaction of the judgment. Proceedings in examination of relator as the judgment debtor were had before respon*692dent. During this examination, nine questions were propounded to relator, in response to which relator refused to answer. In his refusal, relator invoked the privilege against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. North v. KirtleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Lee v. CavanaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Howard v. AllisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Cantor v. SaitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Strodtman v. HaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Rowland Group, Inc. v. KoehrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State ex rel. Long v. AskrenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- State ex rel. Taylor v. LutenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- State ex rel. Realty Consultants, Inc. v. DowdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- Financial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Norris (In re Norris)District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.