Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Taylor v. Luten

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1986No. 51008PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION

KAROHL, Judge.

This is an original proceeding in prohibition. Rule 97; § 530.010 et seq. RSMo 1978. Relator alleges that respondent circuit judge exceeded his jurisdiction in making the following order:

Plaintiff’s motions to strike defendant’s pleading and for protective order heard and sustained.

It is ordered that defendant’s pleadings are stricken and defendant may not testify at trial, unless defendant produces herself for deposition to answer questions relevant to the issues in this case within thirty (30) days.

Respondent entered the order in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. BendaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. Pulliam v. SwinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. Howard v. AllisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. State ex rel. Flynn v. SchroederMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State ex rel. Hudson v. WebberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SidebottomSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  2. Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State Ex Rel. Hayter v. GriffinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State Ex Rel. Lieberman v. GoldmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. State ex rel. Kimberly Barks, Relator v. The Honorable Daniel PelikanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API