Legal Opinion
In re Schwartz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 4, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Petitioner, Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, moves for an order temporarily suspending respondent from the practice of law pursuant to Judiciary Law §90 (4) (f) and directing him to show cause pursuant to Judiciary Law §90 (4) (g) why a final order of censure, suspension, or disbarment should not be made.
The petition is based on a certificate of conviction issued out of the Supreme Court, County of New York, showing that on June 23, 1989 respondent was convicted, upon his plea of guilty, of one count of scheming to defraud in the…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- In re LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In re RichterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re WolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- In re HustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- In re Minkel, Jr.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re NedickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re ClementeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re JanoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998