Legal Opinion
In re Hust
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 2, 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Petitioner, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Department, moves for an order (1) determining that the crimes of which respondent has been convicted are serious *157crimes, (2) directing that respondent be suspended pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (f), and (3) directing that respondent be ordered to show cause pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (g) why a final order of censure, suspension or removal shotild not occur.
Respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney in New York State by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Department, on…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In re RichterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re LowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
4Cited by6 opinions
- In re SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re KazdinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re NedickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re LidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re NovakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.