Legal Opinion

Lackey v. Cook

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1979No. 7822SC444PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in determining that an alias summons issued more than 90 days after the original summons was issued could relate back to the date of issue of the original summons so as to keep alive the action originally instituted on 8 June 1977. We agree with the defendant’s contention and accordingly reverse.

*525The summons in this case was issued on 8 June 1977. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 4(c) provides (with certain exceptions not here pertinent relating to tax and assessment foreclosures) that “[p]ersonal service or substituted personal service of summons as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mintz v. . FrinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Neely v. . MinusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Webb v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Hodges v. Home Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hall v. LassiterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. In Re Adoption of SearleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Reese v. BarbeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Bryson v. CortCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Ellis v. KimbroughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API