In Re Adoption of Searle
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Respondent’s first two assignments of error raise the single issue of whether it was error for the court to instruct the jury that, for purposes of determining the period of respondent’s alleged abandonment of his child, the adoption proceeding was instituted on 2 August 1983. We hold that the action was not instituted on 2 August 1983 and that the court’s instruction to the jury was erroneous.
We note first that respondent failed to note anywhere in the record his exceptions to the trial court’s jury instructions. Further, no exceptions are listed under the relevant assignments…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Craver v. CraverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Roshelli v. SperryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Oxendine v. Catawba County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Marsico v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Williams v. BraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. CagleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- In re Adoption of DuncanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Dean v. BrunoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- In Re the Adoption of ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- In Re the Adoption of ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.