Legal Opinion
C.C. v. Polaris Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 7, 2019No. 18-2066-cvUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
18-2066-cv C.C. v. Polaris Industries, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Vernon Snype, Marisa HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Vittorio Amuso, Also Known as Jesse, Also Known as VicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Hyde v. County of RensselaerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Turi Caiazzo and Frank Caiazzo v. Volkswagenwerk A. G., and Volkswagen of America, Inc., Bruce Beard Volkswagen, Inc. And James ValentineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Ali v. Nyc Police Officer Donald KippCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.