Application of Milton E. Herr
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1ConcurrenceRich, Judge
The Board of Appeals wrote a carefully reasoned opinion (Mar. 29, 1965) in this case and, a year afterward, gave extensive en banc consideration to the problem of res judicata in the Patent Office. Ex parte Budde, 150 USPQ 469 (Mar. 14, 1966).1 The en banc consideration was stated to have been “because of the importance of the legal issue,” and it is indeed important. It is also a question of some difficulty and much confusion.
In deciding this case the board majority placed primary reliance on two of our decisions, Lundberg and Prutton.. As to the first it said:
In our opinion, the case of In…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hemphill Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Blackford v. WilderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1907
- In re Barratt's AppealCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1899
- Application of PruttonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.