Legal Opinion · Dissent
Charles S. Fields, Inc. v. American Hydrotherm Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 27, 1958Published
1DissentFrank, J.
We are impelled to dissent from the affirmance of a Special Term order denying the application of the petitioner to stay arbitration.
*650In 1-956, Charles S. Melds, Ine.> the petitioner, entered into discussions with American Hydrotherm Corp., the respondent (for convenience, the parties will be referred to as -Fields and American/), concerning the proposed purchase by Fields of a heating and cooling system to be used in its plant. On October 22, 1956, after extended negotiations.;, American submitted a document to Fields entitled ‘‘ Final •Quotation”, containing detailed specifications relating…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Matter of Lehman v. OstrovskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- In Re the Arbitration Between Level Export Corp. & Wolz, Aiken & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- In Re the Arbitration Between Albrecht Chemical Co. & Anderson Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Klar v. H. & M. Parcel Room, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.