Legal Opinion

In re Knoll

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

On March 2, 1992, in the United States District Court for *137the Western District of New York, at Buffalo, the respondent was convicted, upon a jury verdict, of filing false statements in a bankruptcy proceeding and making a false statement to the Department of Justice in violation of 18 USC §§ 152 and 1001.

We find that the Federal felonies are essentially similar to New York Penal Law § 175.35, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, a class E felony. Both the Federal statute and the New York statute require presentation of a false instrument to a branch…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re JohnstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In re BejasaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. In re NapoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. In re ConneryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re GelleneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re ZumboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re TracyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. In re TrammellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API