Smith v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court 1
Mr. Associate Justice Stukes
delivered the Opinion of the Court:
I regret that I find myself in disagreement with Mr. Acting Associate Justice Stoll in a very small particular of this case. I think the judgment below should be affirmed without modification.
In the first place, contest as to interest on the amount of the “face of the policy” was not decided by the lower Court (it is not mentioned in the apparently exhaustive decree), so it is not a proper subject for review by this Court. But considering it anyway, I do not think it was error to allow such interest.
The case was tried upon a…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Cothran.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Salinas & Son v. EllisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
- Reynolds v. PriceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- Tolbert v. FoucheSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Manning v. Brandon CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Keese v. ParnellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- South Carolina Insurance v. Collins Ex Rel. Estate of CollinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Young v. Life Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
- Hardee v. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- Eaves v. Progressive Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- O'Daniell v. Missouri InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.