Legal Opinion

Keese v. Parnell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 2, 1925No. 11779PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This Court is entirely satisfied with the reasoning and conclusions of the Circuit Judge (Judge Bonham) upon the merits of this controversy.

The only question remaining is whether there was error in the order of Special Judge Eanham in referring the case to the Special Referee to take the testimony, over the objection of the defendants.

It has been decided by the Court in the case of Newell v. Blankenship, 130 S. C., 131; 125 S. E., 420, that even in an equitable action, the Court has no power to compulsorily order a reference, except…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1891
  2. Newell Contracting Co. v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  2. Cantey v. Edward L. Summersett & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Moss v. BurdetteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API