Legal Opinion

Ransom v. Haner

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided June 18, 1959No. 7966-APublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, District Judge.

This matter is before this court on a motion to dismiss the action for the reason that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and for the further reason that plaintiff’s exclusive remedy lies under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

The complaint filed herein alleges that the plaintiff was employed by the Ketch-ikan Pulp Company and the American Viscose Company to work as a machinist’s helper. The defendant Vic Haner is the general superintendent and the defendant Marion Keyes is the assistant superintendent and foreman for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. Warner v. LederSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Bresnahan v. BarreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Kowcun v. BybeeOregon Supreme Court · 1947

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Meyer v. KendigWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Dawley v. ThisiusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Vittum v. New Hampshire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  5. Hockett v. ChapmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API