Lagro v. Lagro
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Less than ten months after the district court awarded primary physical custody of the child to the father, the mother moved to amend the judgment to change custody. After the district court denied the motion, she appealed the order. Concluding the district court did not err in denying an evidentiary hearing, we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Leah and James Lagro were divorced on March 3, 2004. From their marriage, they have one child, who was five years old at the time of the divorce. The mother was given primary physical custody while the divorce was pending. After the divorce trial,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kelly v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Marriage of Nice-Petersen v. Nice-PetersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Tank v. TankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Quarne v. QuarneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- O'Neill v. O'NeillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Green v. GreenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Dietz v. DietzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Frueh v. FruehNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Vining v. RentonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Kourajian v. KourajianNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.