Legal Opinion

Frueh v. Frueh

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2008No. 20070254PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Darin G. Frueh appeals an amended district court order denying an evidentiary hearing on his motion for change of custody. We hold Frueh has presented sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case for modification of custody; therefore, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on his motion.

I

[¶ 2] Darin Frueh and Melissa Frueh, now known as Melissa Hoheisel, were divorced in January 2004. By stipulation, Hoheisel was awarded custody of their minor child, and Frueh was awarded visitation. At the time of the divorce, Hoheisel moved with the child from the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Tank v. TankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Gietzen v. GietzenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Bertsch v. BertschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Dietz v. DietzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. DUFNER v. TrottierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Frueh v. FruehNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Green v. GreenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Schumacker v. SchumackerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API