Legal Opinion

Vining v. Renton

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2012No. 20110233PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Ashley Vining appeals a district court amended judgment granting Michael Renton’s motion to modify primary residential responsibility for their child. Vin-ing argues the district court’s decision was clearly erroneous. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Vining and Renton are the parents of a 4-year-old child. They never married and have not lived together since the child was born. On April 24, 2008, Vining and Renton filed with the district court a stipulated child custody agreement giving Vining primary residential responsibility subject to Renton’s right to exercise parenting time as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Blotske v. LeidholmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hendrickson v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Kelly v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Van Dyke v. Van DykeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kartes v. KartesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Schroeder v. SchroederNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Larson v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Krueger v. TranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Hageman v. HagemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API