Vining v. Renton
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Ashley Vining appeals a district court amended judgment granting Michael Renton’s motion to modify primary residential responsibility for their child. Vin-ing argues the district court’s decision was clearly erroneous. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Vining and Renton are the parents of a 4-year-old child. They never married and have not lived together since the child was born. On April 24, 2008, Vining and Renton filed with the district court a stipulated child custody agreement giving Vining primary residential responsibility subject to Renton’s right to exercise parenting time as…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hendrickson v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Blotske v. LeidholmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Hendrickson v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Kelly v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Van Dyke v. Van DykeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kartes v. KartesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Schroeder v. SchroederNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Larson v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Krueger v. TranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Hageman v. HagemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.