Legal Opinion

Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 9, 1976No. C.D. 4677; Court No. 68/67256PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WatsoN, Judge:

The correct classification of the shipment of fluorspar under dispute depends on whether or not it was more than 97% calcium fluoride by weight. The district director at the port of New Orleans found it to be less than 97% calcium fluoride and classified it under item 522.24 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, dutiable at the rate of $8.40 per ton. Plaintiff contends the shipment contained more than 97% calcium fluoride and should have been classified pursuant to item 522.21 and assessed with duty at the rate: of $2.10 per ton.

At the trial, both sides offered evidence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aluminum Co. of America v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Target Stores v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API