Legal Opinion

American Sporting Goods v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 20, 2003No. SLIP OP. 03-31; 95-05-00627PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOLDBERG, Senior Judge.

This matter is before the Court following trial de novo. At issue is the proper classification of six entries of certain footwear that the plaintiff calls “chula” sandals (“sandals”). The parties agree on the basic nature of the merchandise in dispute and that it is classifiable as “[o]ther footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics: [o]ther footwear” under heading 6402 of the 1994 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”).

They part company with respect to a single issue: whether the external surface area of the upper (“ESAU”) of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Anhydrides & Chemicals, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. BP Oil Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API