Harhen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson
Plaintiff brought suit for declaratory judgment and to compel arbitration, asking that the coverage under the uninsured motorist provisions in each of the four policies issued by defendant to the deceased, be held to apply to an automobile accident, thus entitling decedent’s estate to a maximum recovery of *40,000. Defendant answered that due to an exclusionary clause contained in each policy, uninsured motorist coverage was limited to the amount recoverable under the one policy specifically covering the car decedent was occupying, and therefore plaintiff could assert a claim of a maximum of *10,000…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Glidden v. Farmers Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Squire v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Barnes v. PowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- Doxtater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Bertini v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schmick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Jimenez v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Obenland v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Libdy v. Companion Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Montano v. Allstate Indemnity Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.