Jimenez v. Foundation Reserve Insurance
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALTERS, Justice.
Plaintiff Angelo Jimenez, through a declaratory judgment action, sought determination of his entitlement to stack the uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage applying to two cars for which he had purchased insurance under a single policy. Jimenez had paid a separate premium for each car covered. The policy issued by defendant Foundation Reserve Insurance Company contained a limit-of-liability clause that prohibited stacking of uninsured/underinsured benefits. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment on the issues of stacking and on the amount Jimenez should…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Schmick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Cameron Mutual Insurance Co. v. MaddenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Hood v. FulkersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Lopez Ex Rel. Estate of Lopez v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Ponder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Padilla v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Montano v. Allstate Indemnity Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- Sanchez v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Claro Gonzales and Tomasa R. Gonzales, by Personal Representative v. Millers Casualty Insurance Company of Texas, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.