Legal Opinion

Jimenez v. Foundation Reserve Insurance

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1988No. 17341PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALTERS, Justice.

Plaintiff Angelo Jimenez, through a declaratory judgment action, sought determination of his entitlement to stack the uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage applying to two cars for which he had purchased insurance under a single policy. Jimenez had paid a separate premium for each car covered. The policy issued by defendant Foundation Reserve Insurance Company contained a limit-of-liability clause that prohibited stacking of uninsured/underinsured benefits. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment on the issues of stacking and on the amount Jimenez should…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Schmick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co. v. MaddenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Hood v. FulkersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Lopez Ex Rel. Estate of Lopez v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Ponder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Padilla v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Montano v. Allstate Indemnity Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Sanchez v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Claro Gonzales and Tomasa R. Gonzales, by Personal Representative v. Millers Casualty Insurance Company of Texas, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API