Legal Opinion

Mabb v. Merriam

California Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1900No. L.A. No. 614PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an action brought to reform a contract and to recover damages for an alleged breach thereof. The question arising upon the appeal is presented upon the face of the complaint.

We will consider the single proposition, Do the facts alleged justify a reformation of the contract as prayed for? The facts are these: Plaintiff J. W. Mabb and defendant Merriam verbally agreed to exchange lands. Plaintiff J. J. Mabb was the husband of his coplaintiff, and in conjunction with one Streeter, the agent of both parties, attended to the drawing up of the preliminary contract. In this contract the name…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cantlay v. Olds & Stoller Inter-ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Goodfellow v. BarrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Wilson v. SheaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. House v. McMullenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. Wayte v. Bowker Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API