Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Eiland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1915No. 865. [fn*]Published

Appeal from District Court, Hutchinson County; P. P. Greever, Judge. Action by Enoch Eiland against George P. Hamilton. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHendricks, J.

The appellee, Eiland, sued the appellant, Hamilton, on four promissory vendor’s lien notes, for the establish-, ment of .a debt and to foreclose the lien, the. appellee being the original vendor and the appellant the original vendee. Among other defenses, the defendant specially pleaded that prior to the purchase of the land by him, the lines and boundaries of the land purchased were pointed out by the plaintiff and relied upon, and but for which he would not have purchased said land; that the boundaries so represented were not the real boundaries of the land purchased. Defendant also pleaded…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ZappTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Ennis Mercantile Co. v. WathenTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Torrey, Davidson & Grosscup v. Wm. Cameron & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Bath v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API