Legal Opinion

Bath v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 9, 1904PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, Chief Justice.

Suits were instituted' By appellant against appellees severally for damage to cotton shipped from Ennis,. Texas, to Galveston, Texas, and thence by vessel to- Liverpool, England. The suits were consolidated and the trial resulted1 in a- verdict and! judgment for appellees, from which this appeal has- been, prosecutedi

We are met in the outset with an objection on the part of appellees to a consideration of the principal assignments of error on the ground that there is no statement of facts such as required by law contained in the record, and it will be necessary for us…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boggess v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Renn v. SamosTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  3. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Witt v. Kaufman & KleaverTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. IvyTexas Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. O'Hara v. Texas Nat. Bank of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Hamilton v. EilandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Brown v. State.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Houston & T. C. R. v. Paris Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API