Murph v. Landrum
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Proceedings for injunction in the original jurisdiction of the Court: (1) W. W. Murph against B. G. Landrum et'al.; (2) Louis B. Cox against James Hodges et al.; (3) Jos.
Read the full summary
Proceedings for injunction in the original jurisdiction of the Court: (1) W. W. Murph against B. G. Landrum et'al.; (2) Louis B. Cox against James Hodges et al.; (3) Jos. W. Coward against J. H. Blackwell et al.; (4) John A. Weir against F. P. Walker et al.; (5) Robert E. Ligón against E. H. Burris et al.; (6) Pickens County against A. W. Jones, as Comptroller General; (7) Oconee County against A. W. Jones, as Comptroller General; (8) Adam L. Aull against A. W. Jones, as Comptroller General. in all the cases, except in Weir against Walker, Mr. Jno. G. Capers appeared with them; and in Coward…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Jones.
This Court, on the 12th day of January, 1906, filed the following judgment in the above stated cases, which were heard together:
“In each of these cases, brought in the original jurisdiction of this Court, the question is raised as to the constitutionality of the act commonly known as the Brice act, approved 25th of February, A. D. 1904, amending section 7 of the general dispensary law, approved March 6th, 1896.
“After careful consideration, this Court is of the opinion that said act is not unconstitutional on any of the grounds…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Utsey v. HiottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
- Severance v. MurphySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
3Cited by12 opinions
- Shillito v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- Doran v. RobertsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- Parker v. Bates, TreasurerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- State v. TouchberrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Bagnall v. Clarendon & Orangeburg Bridge Dist.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.