Legal Opinion

Estate of Naulin v. Clancy

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1972No. 187PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

In his will, Mike Naulin stated:

“I direct that the total corpus of Trust ‘A’ shall equal thirty-three and one-third (331/3 %) percent of the total of my gross estate as finally determined for United. States Federal Estate Tax purposes (not including therein property which does not pass under this Will), after deducting from the whole of such gross estate the total allowed as deductions for such Federal Estate Tax purposes for claims against my estate and funeral and administration expenses.” (R. 17)

In addition to other lengthy testamentary clauses, the will contained the provision:

“As…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Will of LeitschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Cudahy v. CudahyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Mitchell v. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Will of Blomdahl v. ErlandsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Van Schaack v. Amsouth Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Madison General Hospital Medical & Surgical Foundation, Inc. v. VolzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. King v. OnthankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  4. Poehling v. Trust Point, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API