Legal Opinion

Madison General Hospital Medical & Surgical Foundation, Inc. v. Volz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1977No. 75-609PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Two issues are presented on appeal:

1. What was the intention of the testatrix, Alma Ganser, in making the bequests in Clause SEVENTEENTH of her will?

2. Does an award to the respondents constitute an improper application of the doctrine of cy pres ?

Intent of Testatrix

The paramount object of will construction is the ascertainment of the testatrix’s intent. Estate of Farber, 57 Wis.2d 363, 368, 204 N.W.2d 478 (1973); Estate of Southey, 26 Wis.2d 335, 338, 132 N.W.2d 532 (1965). This intent is determined from the language of the will itself, considered in light of the circumstances surrounding…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Warren v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Estate of Gibbs v. KrauseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Estate of Mangel v. StrongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Mahon v. Security First National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Estate of FarberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Matter of Estate of LohrCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  2. Firstar Trust Co. v. First National Bank of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  3. C. R. Ex Rel. Herrick v. American Standard InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  4. Independence Bank Waukesha (N.A.) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. David MacLeish v. Boardman & Clark LLPWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API