Legal Opinion

Strong v. Ross

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1905No. 5,596PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Benton Circuit Court; Joseph M. Babb, Judge. Action by Joseph Ross against Lutber G. Strong for ejectment and damages. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The appellee sued the appeilant, who has sought to present for our consideration the sixth instruction given to the jury by the court of its own motion. By *175entries of record it is shown that the trial was commenced June 23, 1904, and that on the next day, “after the conrlusion of the evidence and the argument of counsel, and the instructions of the judge,” the jury retired, and afterward, on the same day, they returned their verdict, which is set out; also, that on Monday, June 27, 1904, the appellant filed his motion for a new trial, in which the only specification of alleged error in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Speck v. KenoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Patterson v. State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Fame Laundry Co. v. HenryIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. QuinnIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Tell City Canning Co. v. WilburIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Cronin v. KeeslingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API