Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Quinn

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1913No. 7,753PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Prom Randolph Circuit Court; J ames 8. Engle, Judge. Action by Bertha L. Quinn, administratrix of the estate of Rufus L. Quinn, deceased, against The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

Action by appellee against appellant to recover damages for the death of her husband, Rufus L. Quinn, alleged to have been caused by the latter’s negligence. The *14original complaint was in three paragraphs. Later a fourth was filed, and separate demurrers to each were overruled. Appellant answered in two paragraphs, (1) general denial; (2) statute of limitations addressed to the fourth paragraph only. Demurrer to second paragraph of answer overruled. Appellee then filed a reply in two paragraphs; (1) that the cause of action set up in the fourth paragraph of complaint is the same as in the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Domestic Block Coal Co. v. DeArmeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Inland Steel Co. v. YedinakIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GossettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Citizens National Bank of Grant County v. HarveyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. StarksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Wm. P. Jungclaus Co. v. RattiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Coal Bluff Mining Co. v. McMahonIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Glasser v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API