Legal Opinion

Stahl v. Rawlins

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 1957No. 15291PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Justice.

Pursuant to authority of Rule 166-A, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the trial court, after a hearing, had sustained ap-pellee’s motion for summary judgment; decreeing that Mrs. Stahl (formerly Mudge) take nothing by her suit to cancel an existing contract of employment had with John A. Rawlins; also sustaining his cross-action for enforcement of said employment contract which provided for a one-fourth interest to him in all property, real, personal or mixed, recovered by her in cause No.94-F/J, styled Mudge v. Mudge; the contract allegedly extending to a property settlement…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Citizens National Bank v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. James Stewart & Co. v. LawTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Barron v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. Knox, Recr.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. City of Mesquite v. Scyene Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Derr Construction Co. v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Manuel Cedillo, Alberto Sanchez v. Standard Oil Company of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  3. In Re Gulf Oil/Cities Service Tender Offer Lit.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  4. Rawlins v. StahlCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Kopczynski v. MillsapCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API