Legal Opinion
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brown
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 19, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2009-1423PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) brings this action, against Defendants Elaine M. Brown and Gary A. Prince 1 alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq., the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq., and Rules promulgated under the Exchange Act. This matter is before the Court on Brown’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 95] and Prince’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgement [Dkt. No. 94]. Upon consideration of ,the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re Smith Barney Transfer Agent LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- ['U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. E-SMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- In re Galena Biopharma, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. E-Smart Technologies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.