Legal Opinion
In re Smith Barney Transfer Agent Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 15, 2012No. 05 Civ. 7583(WHP)PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*156 MEMORANDUM & ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge.
In the Eclogues, Virgil observed that “time bears away all things, even our minds.” As this Memorandum & Order illustrates, Virgil’s maxim applies to legal theories as well.
Plaintiffs in this putative class action assert claims against Defendants Smith Barney Fund Management LLC (“Smith Barney”), Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“CGMI,” together with Smith Barney, the “Citi Defendants”), Lewis E. Daidone (“Daidone”), and Thomas W. Jones (“Jones,” together with the Citi Defendants and Daidone, “Defendants”) under sections 10(b) and 20(a)…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- In re Lululemon Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Police & Fire Retirement System v. IndyMac MBS, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Glickenhaus & Company v. Household International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Doubleline Capital LP v. Odebrecht Fin., Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- In re Banco Bradesco S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.