Legal Opinion

State v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 20, 2011No. 20090652-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

DAVIS, Presiding Judge:

1 Willis Legrand Lee III presents three arguments on appeal: (1) that his Sixth Amendment rights were violated when the trial court failed to conduct the proper colloquy in response to his request for new court-appointed counsel; (2) that the court failed to comply with the requirements of rule 11(e) of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure when entering Lee's guilty plea to forcible sexual abuse, a second degree felony, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-404 (Supp.2011); 1 and (8) that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because counsel failed…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. OttUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. TennysonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  5. State v. BrooksUtah Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RettigUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. RettigUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  4. State v. BiebingerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  5. State v. BruhnCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API