State v. Lee
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
DAVIS, Presiding Judge:
1 Willis Legrand Lee III presents three arguments on appeal: (1) that his Sixth Amendment rights were violated when the trial court failed to conduct the proper colloquy in response to his request for new court-appointed counsel; (2) that the court failed to comply with the requirements of rule 11(e) of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure when entering Lee's guilty plea to forcible sexual abuse, a second degree felony, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-404 (Supp.2011); 1 and (8) that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because counsel failed…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. OttUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. TennysonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- State v. BrooksUtah Supreme Court · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. RettigUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. RettigUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- State v. BiebingerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- State v. BruhnCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.