Legal Opinion

State v. Bruhn

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 7, 2019No. 20160382-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HAGEN, Judge:

¶1 Sandra Dee Bruhn appeals her convictions for possession of a controlled substance and operating or riding in a motor vehicle with an open container. Bruhn contends that her trial counsel provided ineffective assistance and requests that we reconsider our prior denial of her rule 23B motion to remand to the district court for fact-finding.

¶2 In her rule 23B motion, Bruhn argues that, because her trial counsel was aware that Bruhn could not remember the details of the events surrounding her criminal charges, he provided ineffective assistance by failing to request a competency…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. United States v. Evelio Mota and Juan FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. VillegasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. State v. GriffinUtah Supreme Court · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API