Legal Opinion

Millner v. DTE Energy Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 30, 2003No. 2:02-cv-71658PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This hybrid Section 301/Elliott-Larsen discrimination action is presently before the Court on two motions for summary judgment separately filed by (1) Defendants DTE Energy Company (“DTE”), Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (“MichCon”), and Plaintiff’s supervisor, Sol Mims, and (2) Defendant Service Workers International Union Gas Workers Local 80 (“Local 80” or the “Union”). Plaintiff Kurt Millner has responded to Defendants’ Motions to which Response Defendants have replied. The Court…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Elezovic v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Kimberly Ondricko v. MGM Grand Detroit, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. Woida v. Genesys Regional Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  4. Kennedy v. R.W.C., Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
  5. Ginderske v. Eaton Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API