Legal Opinion

Tidwell v. Toyota Auto Mart, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 21, 1978No. 77-16PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Guild

The plaintiffs, O’Dell Tidwell, Gary Pollock and Michael Bruce, each brought separate actions against Toyota Auto Mart, Inc., their former employer, to recover bonus payments allegedly due them. The cases were consolidated for a bench trial, following which the court entered judgments in favor of each of the plaintiffs. Toyota appeals from the denial of its post-trial motion and plaintiff Bruce has filed a counterappeal, alleging that the amount of the judgment in his favor was inadequate.

All three plaintiffs testified that they were employed under oral contracts. Tidwell and Pollock…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Security Life Ins. Co. v. MooreAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Mosow v. National Lock Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  3. Ralph v. Karr Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. Leon v. Thorlief Larsen & Son, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  5. Laudeman v. BeylerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jeffrey Lillien v. Peak6 Investments, L.P. And Peak6 L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Johnson v. Figgie International, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Lillien, Jeffrey v. Peak6 InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Shages v. MDScripts Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API