In re Restorff
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Dissent
HUDSON, Justice (dissenting).
On August 1, 2016, 3-year-old G.B. wandered 2½ blocks from Restorff's home daycare facility. He was standing next to a busy highway when a neighbor found him. Law enforcement subsequently returned G.B. to Restorff's home. Although G.B. was not harmed, that fact does nothing to negate the substantial record evidence demonstrating that Restorff failed to properly provide for G.B.'s supervision and thus committed neglect of a minor. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.
I agree with the court's interpretation of "provide for" in part I(A) of the court's opinion. I also…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Urban Council on Mobility v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Senogles v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Webster v. Hennepin Cnty.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018