Legal Opinion

Sala & Ruthe Realty, Inc. v. Campbell

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1973No. 6905PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Batjer, J.:

This is an action for the recovery of a real estate broker’s fee. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found against the appellant. Judgment was entered accordingly for the respondent, denying the appellant a broker’s commission.

Several days prior to September 28, 1969, Brownlee Rostron, a salesman for the appellant realty company, had been in contact with D. W. Campbell and his wife, the owners of the Aloha Motel in Las Vegas, Nevada. Rbstron indicated to D. W. Campbell that if a prospective buyer for the motel should turn up he would like an exclusive…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Tappan Development Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Nat Nal Service Stations, Inc. v. WolfNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Kraftco Corp. v. KoblusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  4. Morrill v. Tehama Consolidated Mill & Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Middleton v. HolecroftMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bird v. Casa Royale WestNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. United Services Auto Ass'n v. SchlangNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Serpa v. DarlingNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Ferrara v. FirschingNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Fleshman v. HendricksNevada Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API