Legal Opinion

United Services Auto Ass'n v. Schlang

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1995No. 23617PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*488OPINION

By the Court,

Steffen, C. J.:

This appeal addresses an issue of first impression in this jurisdiction concerning the meaning and effect of a medical payments (med-pay) clause in an insurance policy that limits payment to expenses incurred within three years from the date of the covered accident. Respondent/cross-appellant Lawrence Schlang contends that he satisfied the conditions of the clause by entering into a requirements contract prior to the expiration of the three-year policy period. He therefore claims that he is entitled to lifetime payments up to the limits of the med-pay…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Meuse-Rhine-Ijssel Cattle Breeders of Canada Ltd. v. Y-Tex Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Harvey v. Fearless Farris Wholesale, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. Reliance Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Ill. v. BooherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Propane Industrial, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1977
  5. Valladares v. Monarch Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Las Vegas Sands, LLC v. NehmeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Galardi v. Naples Polaris, L.L.C.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BowersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  4. Acton v. Fullmer (In Re Fullmer)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2005
  5. Wooten v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API