Legal Opinion
Matter of Anonymous
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 1995No. 45S00-9305-DI-523, 71S00-9406-DI-533PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Disciplinary Commission filed two verified complaints for disciplinary action in separate, unrelated cases alleging similar violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. We now find that the respondent in each case engaged in misconduct as charged and that a private reprimand is the appropriate disciplinary sanction in each case. Given our desire to educate the Bar and the similarity of the cases presented, we herein more fully set forth the facts and cireumstances of each case while preserving the confidential nature of the discipline.
I
In the…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- People v. MorleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- State v. HansenWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Bays v. TheranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by18 opinions
- Douglas v. MonroeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Nass v. State Ex Rel. Unity Team, Local 9212, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement WorkersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Landeen v. PhoneBILLit, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
- Warner v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re ThayerIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.