Legal Opinion
Zachary v. R. H. Macy & Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 28, 1972PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScileppi, J.
In five consolidated actions, each asserting individual and representative causes of action for injunctive and declaratory relief as well as an accounting and recovery of damages pursuant to section 414 (subd. 2) of the Personal Property Law, plaintiffs, who maintain charge accounts with various department stores on a revolving-credit or open-end basis, complain that defendants’ method of computing finance charges on their accounts violates section 413 of the Personal Property *448Law, authorizing finance charges on “ outstanding indebtedness ” only (Personal Property Law, § 413, subd. 3)1.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Kovarsky v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Hogg v. RuffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Sloan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- State v. J. C. Penney Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Haas v. Pittsburgh National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Johnson v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Jordan Brown, and All Others Similarly Situated v. First National City BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Brame v. Ray Bills Finance Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1979
- Fox v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.