Bennett v. St. John's Home
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentWhalen, J.
I respectfully dissent because I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that plaintiff waived his contention that defendants’ motion for summary judgment should have been denied as untimely. I would therefore reverse the order and judgment, deny defendants’ motion, and reinstate the complaint.
Where, as here, Supreme Court does not schedule a deadline for filing motions for summary judgment, “such motion shall be made no later than one hundred and twenty days after the filing of the note of issue, except with leave of court on good cause shown” (CPLR 3212 [a]; see O'Brien v Bainbridge, 109…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Mitchell v. New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Miceli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Coty v. County of ClintonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Jones v. Town of Le RayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.